Have you ever sat in a board meeting where the question "Are we protected?" is met with a confident, "Of course, we’re in the cloud"?
It’s a common security blanket. We’ve migrated critical workflows, Salesforce for CRM, Microsoft 365 for collaboration, and Atlassian for engineering, into the public cloud. We assume that because these providers have massive infrastructures, our data is wrapped in an unbreakable vault.
But here’s the cold, hard truth: Being "in the cloud" is not the same as being "backed up." This Cloud Backup Myth is more than just a misunderstanding, it’s a foundational operational risk. If you’re relying on your SaaS provider as your only safety net, you’re operating without a floor.
The biggest hurdle in IT leadership is confusing platform resilience with data safety.
Major cloud providers are masters of High Availability (HA). If a data center in Dublin goes dark, the service stays up via a mirror in Amsterdam. However, HA is a double-edged sword. Because the system replicates changes instantly, it cannot distinguish between a valid update and a destructive one.
This is exactly how ransomware can effectively affect cloud data. If malware encrypts a file on an endpoint, the sync engine sees a "modification" and replicates that encrypted mess across all data centers. The system isn't broken, it's doing exactly what it was built to do: keep all copies perfectly synchronized, even the corrupted ones.
Your Service Level Agreement (SLA) is governed by the Shared Responsibility Model (SRM). It’s a legal binary: the provider manages the "Cloud" (hardware and uptime), while the customer manages the "Data" (identities, configurations, and backups).
If an admin accidentally triggers a mass-deletion, the provider's job is to ensure that command executes perfectly. This is why a standard retention policy is not a substitute for backup; retention keeps data for compliance audits, but it rarely provides the granular "Time Machine" interface needed to restore a complex environment to a specific point in time.
In specialized platforms like Jira, recovery gaps are even wider:
Threats have evolved beyond human error to API-based encryption that bypasses the desktop entirely.
Case Study: The Midnight Blizzard Attack
In early 2024, the threat actor Midnight Blizzard (NOBELIUM) bypassed traditional malware routes. They used "password spraying" to compromise a legacy account and manipulated OAuth applications to grant themselves elevated permissions. This allowed them to exfiltrate and manipulate data via APIs without ever triggering endpoint defenses.
Source: MSRC - Update on Midnight Blizzard Attack
Because these attacks use valid credentials, the cloud provider sees "authorized" activity and replicates the damage across all regions, locking you out of your own data.
To bridge the gap between "Cloud Safety" and Data Sovereignty, you need an active strategy:
The cloud is secure for infrastructure, but for your data, safety is a strategy, not a built-in feature. It’s time to decouple data safety from platform availability.